Apr. 30, 2008 23:45
A nice summary of the Rice situation at Business Week.
Posted by NancyOta under [News ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Business Week has a nice summary just posted of the rice crisis:
http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/apr2008/gb20080428_894449.htm
Rice is obviously one of the most important crops in the world, and has been for a very long time. Much of the worlds poorest populations, particularly in Africa and Asia depend on rice as the primary staple their daily diet.
submitted by Dave
Rice prices have soared tremendously, one statistic in this article is particularly telling I think: Rice from Thailand was priced at $320/ton at the end of last year. Now, a mere four months later, it is $1100/ton. Thats more than a 300% increase! The article points out that most rice is not traded, but consumed domestically.
One thing that is not really discussed in this short summary however is the impact on urban poor. As we all know, urban areas in Africa and particularly in Asia are drawing many people from rural areas. Imagine the impact on these people who spend a large portion of their budget on food, particualrly rice. This is also putting pressure on the very organizations that provide aid for the world's hungry. Estimates are that this spike in rice prices will push an additional 100 million people into starvation conditions. Thats the equivalent of one third of the U.S. population that could feed itself before, but now will be unable to feed itself.
Some other interesting points brought out in this short peice: the role of speculators and the impact of export restrictions imposed by India and Vietmnam (the second and third largest exporters of rice respectively). These measures backfired and encouraged speculators to horde rice. Speculators are playing a big role in making this problem worse, much as they do in the oil markets.
Finally, high oil prices and the drive for biofuel are also contributing to the escalating rice crisis. Because so much corn is being grown for ethanol in the US, that decreases the amount of wheat that is planted. Higher wheat prices makes more people turn to rice for their needs, this increases demand for rice and the price for it.
This problem has the potential to get far worse, lets hope that somehow the price goes back down or at least stabilizes. If it doesn't we are looking at a humanitarian disaster of epic proportions.
Apr. 30, 2008 19:15
Financial bubble burst and governmental response in China
Posted by NancyOta under [Finance ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
An article from the british newspaper The Independent, published on April 23, deals with the financial bubble burst in China which started last October, and which affected the CSI 300, the leading indice of the Shenzhen and the Shangai stock exchanges. This market decline is described by the commentator as the most severe since the record reached by the CSI 300 in mid-October 2007.
The shock was hard for investors of the Shangai stock exchange, as a majority of them are retail investors, that is to say, individual investors who purchased small amounts of securities. Many Chinese people had invested much of their personal assets to buy stocks and take advantage of the financial positive trend. The commentator further explains (this may be directly linked to small investors' inexpertise) that lack of diversification of portfolios for a majority of investors could just make the strike more painful.
As a response to the decline, the Chinese Government lowered the tax on securities transactions from 0,3% to 0,1% on April 24 (that was already its level in May 2007, before the same Government decided to raise it to 0,3% to cool down what was considered as an overheated market at the time). The decision was greatly appreciated by investors at large, since the CIS 300 went up by almost 10% on the same day. But for experts, this governmental intervention will only have a positive impact on the short term.
To read the analysis from The Independent, written before the Chinese Government intervention, follow the link below:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/analysis-and-features/chinas-bubble-bursts-814073.html
Tina Wetchy
Apr. 30, 2008 19:07
Environmental Costs of Shipping Groceries Around the World
Posted by NancyOta under [General ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Educated consumers with sophisticated palates have come to expect their local grocery stores to be stocked all year round with foodstuffs that normally would not be grown during certain times of the year. These consumers have gotten used to the low prices and welcome further price drops; however, cheaper and non-seasonal produce, among other groceries, comes at another price--Pollution. Particularly carbon dioxide emissions from ships and planes, whose fuel for transporting goods, including food, is exempt from taxes, unlike trucks, cars and buses. Proponents of repealing the exemption and implementing a tax say ending these breaks could help ensure that producers and consumers pay the environmental cost of increasingly well-traveled food. While companies are beginning to include carbon "footprints" on the labels of their products, they are far from accepting any type of taxation on transportation enabling them to take advantage of cheaper processing and production costs abroad.
The notion of a repeal of the agreement barring taxes on air and shipping fuel, and the subsequent taxation on the same is a good idea in theory, however, in practice it will not likely work. While many countries would gladly take advantage of the extra tax revenues, those countries choosing not to implement a tax would incur enormous trade advantages, and create an unbalanced, international "patch-work" of taxation. In addition, there are other avenues that can deal with the problem of pollution as a result of transportation. Educating consumers about products' carbon footprints is a good start; with information at hand, people will make conscious decisions when buying goods whose pollution history is easily traceable. The market, having spoken, will govern how companies conduct their respective businesses and give them an ultimatum; either offset your carbon or find new avenues for cost cutting that are less pollutive.
submitted by Michael
Apr. 30, 2008 03:36
Prohibition of subsidies in Europe: will State loan to Italian airline company Alitalia be struck down by the European Commission, European antitrust authority?
Posted by NancyOta under [General ][ (1) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
By plegding to help the national airline Alitalia financially, and by announcing the grant of a 300 million euros loan, the newly-elected Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi has entered into a difficult battle with the European Commission. Alitalia was created in 1947. It started facing severe financial hardships in 2001 and the situation just kept worsening. The Italian company is now close to bankruptcy: its debt averages 1,4 billion euros, and its losses total 1 million euros per day.
See the article published in the NY Times:
State aids in the European Union, an antitrust law notion
As a Member State of the European Union, Italy must abide by European law and legislation, which has prohibited State aids (European law wording for subsidies) since the founding of the European Union in 1957. This prohibition ensures that governmental actions do not distort competition among Member States and intra-European trade. If the loan to Alitalia was to be analized as a “State aid”, it could be struck down by the European Commission, that is the European antitrust authority. And if nevertheless, Italy decided to implement the measure, the European Commission would be entitled to recover the amount of the loan, as a penalty.
A State aid is an advantage in any form whatsoever granted by national public authorities on a selective basis and which favours undertakings (for the complete definition, refer to Article 87 of the Treaty establishing the European Community:
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:12002E087:EN:HTML )
See also the document “Application of Articles 92 and 93 [currently 87 and 88] of the EC Treaty (…) to State aids in the aviation sector”, which provides for a specific regime of scrutiny:
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/energy_transport/state_aid/doc/art_92_93_en.pdf
Any aid measure by a Member State must be notified first and exclusively to the European Commission for approval. In the Alitalia case, the European Commission has expressed some doubts about the legal nature of the loan to the airline. Prime Minister Berlusconi argues that the measure would be a “commercial” loan, that is, a loan with the same characteristics and interest rate as any other loan granted on the open market, so that Alitalia would not be treated more favorably than any other economic operator. But the European Commission takes the view that such measure would nevertheless be analysed as a State aid where the creditor knows that advantage is conferred to an insolvent debtor. The interpretation given to the notion of State aid by the European Court of Justice is very broad, both in terms of origins of the subsidy (State or State-controlled entities) and nature of the grant (it may be positive grants of money, or tax exemptions…). Loans with preferential interest rates have already been struck down as amounting to State aids, hence the preference for a “commercial” loan for Alitalia.
Explanations: European Commission strict scrutiny
With respects to subsidies to airlines, the European Commission will scrutinize several points (see “Application”, p.690):
- “whether the loan is made on normal commercial terms” (interest rate charged, security backing the loan sufficiently enough to repay it in the event of default), and
- “whether such loan would have been available from a commercial bank”.
The test used is the “market economy investor” test: if the expenses incurred to invest in the airline would yield structural profits in the future, which would cover expenses, then the loan can be granted (see “Application” p.689). But if the sole effect of the loan is to cover operating losses, than it is sure to be struck down by the European Commission.
Italy has a particular incentive to label the State measure as a “commercial” loan: it has already resorted to subsidies in aid of Alitalia with the consent of the European antitrust authority. The State aids prohibition is not a full-scale one: Articles 87(3) and 87(2) of the Treaty establishing the European Community set forth exceptional situations (called “exemptions”) where aid measures are deemed “compatible to the [European] common market”. In the case of Alitalia, could Italy ground its contention on Article 87(3)(c) and argue that the loan “promote[s] the development of [a] certain economic activit[y]” in a way that preclude airlines market concentration (thus promoting competition on the European territory)?
The reasoning, if used, is not likely to convince the European Commission. The “Application” guidelines set forth a strict scrutiny and a restrictive interpretation of Article 87(3). Insofar as the measure does “not adversely affect trading conditions to an extent contrary to the common interest” (Article 87(3)(c)), the State aid to airlines must be part of a “comprehensive restructuring programme”. In short, the airline should not have received previous State aids, and the aid measure should render it viable structurally, within a reasonable time (for details, see “Application”, p.692 and 693).
But another limit applies: a 10-years buffer period must be left between 2 grants. Italy had already been authorized to grant State aids to Alitalia (1,49 billion euros) from 1997 to 2001. For European Commission Transportation Spokesman Jacques Barrot, any new aid measure should consequently not be granted before 2011.
Suspense
Should this “commercial” loan granted by Italy and designed to save a doomed company and its employees (some 21,000) be upheld? After this overview of European law, the answer by the European Commission is likely to be negative.
On the European Commission and its European trade law policies, see its website:
http://ec.europa.eu/index_en.htm
Submitted by Tina
Apr. 29, 2008 09:30
UN and World Bank on Food Crisis
Posted by NancyOta under [General ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
This article contains comments from the UN and World Bank on the rise of global food prices.
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2008-04/29/content_6652795.htm
submitted by aurelia
Apr. 29, 2008 09:26
This is an observation about current bank practices and its interaction with the economy. Interesting read.
http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=11089594
submitted by aurelia
Apr. 24, 2008 22:20
Expanion of Lebanese banking operations
Posted by NancyOta under [Finance ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 24, 2008 22:19
Prices of farmland in Europe
Posted by NancyOta under [Finance ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 24, 2008 22:17
Free trade and the Dominican Republic
Posted by NancyOta under [International Politics ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 24, 2008 22:16
NAFTA expansion
Posted by NancyOta under [International Politics ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 24, 2008 22:14
Macau cessation of new gambling operations
Posted by NancyOta under [Finance ][ (27) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 24, 2008 22:12
Latin American agreement on food prices
Posted by NancyOta under [International Politics ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 24, 2008 22:11
Business morale in France and Germany
Posted by NancyOta under [Finance ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 24, 2008 18:56
The Office of the Comptroller Currency (OCC) Creates a New International Supervision Group
Posted by NancyOta under [Finance , International Politics ][ (2) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) was established in 1863 as a bureau of the US Department of the Treasury. The OCC charters, regulates and supervises all national banks. Furthermore, it supervises the federal branches and agencies of foreign banks.
Typical to many government agencies, the OCC performs quasi-legislative and quasi-judicial functions. It has the authority to issue agency rules, legal interpretations, and corporate decisions concerning banking, bank investments, bank community development activities, and other aspects of bank operations.
The OCC activities are based upon four objectives: 1) to ensure the safety and soundness of the national banking system; 2) to encourage competition by allowing banks to offer new products and services; 3) improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the OCC; and 4) to ensure fair and equal access to financial services of all Americans.
http://www.occ.treas.gov/aboutocc.htm
Recently, the OCC announced the creation of a new group to focus on international supervision, stating that "International banking issues have grown increasingly important to the OCC and the national banking system."
http://www.occ.treas.gov/ftp/release/2008-37.htm
This could raise several questions concerning increased political administration in private banking issues. Essentially, since the OCC has the authority to pass regulations and enforce them upon national banks, it has the ability to affect how national banks engage in international agreements.
Suppose that the President decides that it does not condone political activity in Cuba. To foreclose investment in tandem with US banks, the President orders the OCC to scrutinize prospective banks who are in communications with Cuban investors. Effectively, without formal action or accountability, the executive can unilaterally prevent private investment activity to further unrelated agendas.
Granted, perhaps that is a very cynical view, but in my opinion it is not that improbable for the Executive to exercise his influence in that matter. Do you agree that this could create an avenue for underhanded political activity in international banking? Or do you think that the creation of the new group on international activity in OCC will ultimately lead to better coordinated and more profitable investment activity while protecting the banking industry within the United States?
submitted by: Brian
Apr. 23, 2008 17:17
Fuel prices and US airlines
Posted by NancyOta under [Finance ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 23, 2008 17:16
Apr. 23, 2008 17:15
Apr. 23, 2008 17:13
International flying regulation
Posted by NancyOta under [General ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 23, 2008 17:12
Apr. 23, 2008 17:10
Apr. 22, 2008 22:23
Canadian oil sand and US legislation
Posted by NancyOta under [International Politics ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 22, 2008 22:21
Apr. 22, 2008 22:20
Patent extension for pharmaceuticals
Posted by NancyOta under [General ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 22, 2008 22:18
More on Chinese arms sales to Zimbabwe
Posted by NancyOta under [International Politics ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 22, 2008 22:17
Turkish bargaining for EU membership
Posted by NancyOta under [International Politics ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 22, 2008 22:16
Tainted heparin update
Posted by NancyOta under [International Politics ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 21, 2008 20:13
End of Air France-KLM bid for Alitalia
Posted by NancyOta under [Finance ][ (1) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 21, 2008 20:12
US investment firm strategies
Posted by NancyOta under [Finance ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 21, 2008 20:09
Market fluctations and US farmers
Posted by NancyOta under [Finance ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 21, 2008 20:08
Vodafone's brand recognition
Posted by NancyOta under [General ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 21, 2008 20:04
Apr. 21, 2008 20:02
Reaction to new British tax laws
Posted by NancyOta under [Finance ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 21, 2008 10:04
WTO Litigation and Dem candidates
Posted by NancyOta under [International Politics ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Tough Talk on China's Currency
The Democratic candidates were talking to the Alliance for American Manufacturing today, and they had some strong words on the Chinese currency issue.
From Obama:
It’s not just that China is following the path taken by so many other countries before it, and dumping goods into our market while not opening their own markets, something I’ve spoken out against. It’s not just that they’re violating intellectual property rights. They’re also grossly undervaluing their currency, and giving their goods yet another unfair advantage. Each year they’ve had the chance, the Bush administration has failed to do anything about this. That’s unacceptable. That’s why I co-sponsored the Currency Exchange Rate Oversight Reform Act. And that’s why as President, I’ll use all the diplomatic avenues open to me to insist that China stop manipulating its currency.
I thought the reference to "all the diplomatic avenues" was interesting. Does that include WTO litigation, which as we know has become less diplomatic and more legalistic over the years? Are his trade advisers carefully wording his statements to make sure he has not committed himself to bringing a complaint?
submitted by: Jim
Apr. 20, 2008 16:15
New Spanish economic legislation
Posted by NancyOta under [Finance ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 20, 2008 16:13
Apr. 20, 2008 16:11
Apr. 20, 2008 16:09
Arms shipments to Zimbabwe
Posted by NancyOta under [International Politics ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 20, 2008 16:06
WTO's aid focus
Posted by NancyOta under [International Politics ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 20, 2008 06:34
Jubilee Act Passes in the House
Posted by NancyOta under [Finance ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
On April 16, the House passed the Jubilee Act for Responsible Lending and Expanded Debt Cancellation (HR 2634), sending the legislation to the Senate. The legislation calls on the US Treasury Department to negotiate at the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank for an agreement for debt cancellation for poor countries that need cancellation to meet the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) but do not currently qualify for the current IMF/World Bank debt relief initiative.
Here's a link to the House bill.
Apr. 18, 2008 18:05
RBS' efforts to survive credit market
Posted by NancyOta under [Finance ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 18, 2008 18:03
Korean restrictions on US meat products
Posted by NancyOta under [International Politics ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 18, 2008 18:01
Apr. 18, 2008 17:59
Implications of the rice market situation
Posted by NancyOta under [International Politics ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 18, 2008 17:57
Apr. 17, 2008 22:50
International trade today and prospects for 2008 by the WTO
Posted by NancyOta under [General ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 17, 2008 21:29
EU statements on Chinese toys
Posted by NancyOta under [International Politics ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 17, 2008 21:28
Russia/Libya debt agreement
Posted by NancyOta under [International Politics ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 17, 2008 21:26
Apr. 17, 2008 21:24
Australian drought and the rice market
Posted by NancyOta under [General ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 17, 2008 21:22
Apr. 17, 2008 21:21
EU stance on rice export protections
Posted by NancyOta under [Finance ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 17, 2008 21:20
Rice actions by China and the Philippines
Posted by NancyOta under [Finance ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 17, 2008 21:18
Price fixing by Japan Airlines
Posted by NancyOta under [Finance ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 17, 2008 21:16
Apr. 16, 2008 17:15
British government assistance in mortgage market
Posted by NancyOta under [Finance ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 16, 2008 17:14
Mince argument
Posted by NancyOta under [International Politics ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 16, 2008 17:12
Apr. 16, 2008 17:11
Banking institution cleanup
Posted by NancyOta under [Finance ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 16, 2008 17:09
First quarter UK unemployment rate
Posted by NancyOta under [Finance ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 16, 2008 17:08
Plastic compound labelling
Posted by NancyOta under [International Politics ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 16, 2008 17:06
Apr. 16, 2008 17:05
Apr. 16, 2008 17:03
Apr. 16, 2008 17:02
New Venezuelan oil tax scheme
Posted by NancyOta under [Finance ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 16, 2008 17:01
Japanese crackdown on energy stake sale
Posted by NancyOta under [International Politics ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 16, 2008 07:06
Violations of human rights in Tibet: could embargo be the (lawful) answer?
Posted by NancyOta under [International Politics ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
The current repression on Tibetans by Chinese authorities has upset the international public opinion. But which country would take the risk to talk too loud, in a moment where there is so much benefit to be drawn from investing in China? Some politicians like Hans-Gert Poettering (president of the European Parliament) have risen the possibility of boycott (see his words in the Financial Times). But the boycott at issue would be political, not commercial.
Could international trade law ever be used as a way to enforce international human rights law objectively?
Article XX of the GATT set forth exceptions in which the High Contracting Parties are free to adopt measures restricting international trade, that would otherwise be condemnable under the Agreement (as long as the non-discrimination principle is preserved, or as long as the national measure is not a disguised restriction on international trade). But exceptions of Article XX mention no exception relating specifically to human rights, and drafters of the GATT never had the intention to do so. Voices have recommended recently that more deference and consideration be shown by the law of the WTO to this aspect, as humanitarian law should prevail on trade interests (see the Preliminary Report E/CN.4/Sub.2/2000/13 submitted by Special Rapporteurs to the Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, on June 15th, 2000). But those views are related to the impact of globalization on human rights and mostly contemplate labor law. What if one or several countries wanted to start an embargo on Chinese goods, because of violences in Tibet?
Embargos are contrary to the rules enforced by the WTO. In the Shrimp case (November 6th, 1998), the Appelate Body of the WTO has ruled that, concerning measures imposing restrictions of trade extraterritorially, there must be a “sufficient nexus” between the State adopting such a measure and the cause for which the measure is taken. Under this standard, which country could establish such a connection between Tibetans and the embargo measure? The nexus would not be deemed inexistant.
This standard is actually consistent with a fundamental case of public international law. In the South West Africa case, which was decided by the International Court of Justice, Ethiopia and Liberia had brought an action to denounce the apartheid regime enforced by South Africa during its mandate. In its judgment of July, 18th 1966, the Court found that the two countries had no standing to bring this action, because plaintiffs had failed to establish their legal rights or interests in the subject-matter. So that, in international law, there can be no actio popularis (the right for any member of a community to bring an action to defend public and common interests).
This restrictive conception of the international standing shows that moral or humanitarian considerations are not always sufficient to create duties and obligations on members of the international community.
submitted by: Tina
Apr. 15, 2008 21:38
Apr. 15, 2008 21:37
EU/Chinese relations
Posted by NancyOta under [International Politics ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 15, 2008 21:35
Apr. 15, 2008 21:34
Apr. 15, 2008 21:32
Impact of tea trade on China
Posted by NancyOta under [Finance ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 15, 2008 21:30
Future of Russian oil supply
Posted by NancyOta under [Finance ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 15, 2008 21:29
Pakistan/Russia oil alliance
Posted by NancyOta under [International Politics ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 15, 2008 21:28
Gucci copyright suit
Posted by NancyOta under [International Politics ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 15, 2008 21:26
Apr. 15, 2008 21:25
Australian investment in samurai bonds
Posted by NancyOta under [Finance ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 15, 2008 21:23
Biofuels and food crisis
Posted by NancyOta under [International Politics ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 14, 2008 21:33
Apr. 14, 2008 21:30
UK budget and inflation rates
Posted by NancyOta under [Finance ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 14, 2008 21:29
EU-Turkmenistan gas agreement
Posted by NancyOta under [International Politics ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 14, 2008 21:27
Apr. 14, 2008 21:25
Apr. 14, 2008 21:23
More on the Colombia-US free trade act
Posted by NancyOta under [International Politics ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 14, 2008 21:21
Apr. 13, 2008 20:28
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120475150477614511.html
This article, published couple of weeks ago, discusses the ‘unfair’ practice by US Customs who were making shrimp importers post a surety bond as insurance for the antidumping tariff. The article calls the suspicious bond as “a novel accounting trick”. As a result of the bond, many shrimp importers were being run out of business as they had to overextend their credit lines. Nevertheless, the bond has been determined by a WTO panel as inconsistent with America’s WTO obligations. The unfairness is clearly evident, as dumping tariffs are not supposed to be protectionist tool that completely impede any foreign imports.
An interesting aspect of the imposition of the bond is how lobbying groups from shrimp producing States are more powerful in Congress than shrimp importing States. Whenever we have discussed antidumping in class, it is important to always consider the internal politicking that goes on in the halls of Congress between the different States. At the end of the day, the concept of antidumping has been continuously misused as a way to protect local industry rather than create a fair trade system. It seems as if the WTO panel has to constantly be on the watch for this because politicians are looking out for their local constituents more. As we have seen in our case studies, however, WTO has given the member countries’ local authorities considerable leeway in determining antidumping tariffs. However, with the imposition of this bond, the penalty was so great that it was irrefutable that the bond was purely protectionist. The article ends by saying that such measures are not in America’s interest, because they hurt America’s credibility. As we have seen in class, however, that credibility does not seem to be strong already.
submitted by: Mohammad
Apr. 13, 2008 11:03
Impact of globalized tourism
Posted by NancyOta under [General ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 13, 2008 11:00
Apr. 13, 2008 10:58
G7 decisions regarding currency
Posted by NancyOta under [Finance ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 13, 2008 10:57
IMF food cost projections
Posted by NancyOta under [International Politics ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 13, 2008 10:56
Impact of food supplies on Haitian government
Posted by NancyOta under [International Politics ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 12, 2008 09:42
Projected oil market growth for 2008
Posted by NancyOta under [Finance ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 12, 2008 09:41
Apr. 12, 2008 09:39
Another bidder for British Energy
Posted by NancyOta under [Finance ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]
Apr. 12, 2008 09:38
Apr. 12, 2008 09:35
Apr. 12, 2008 09:34
Apr. 11, 2008 12:11
World views on globalization
Posted by NancyOta under [International Politics ][ (0) Comment ] | [ (0) Trackbacks ]